26 November 2012

A mate and I were talking earlier. And at one point, he sent me this:

Dragon > sword

At this point, a swirl of logic popped into my brain. Watch:

Pen > Sword Dragon > Sword Pen > Dragon Typing > Pen Therefore, I can beat a dragon.

How does this 'flawed logic' work? Look again.

~Pen > Dragon~ The dragons are fictional. No doubts about it, they are fake. Fiction, at first, was made by word of tongue, passed through the generations. Then the invention of quills were made, and soon then came the PEN. All of these are tools are to aid in the creation of fiction, or in this case a dragon.

~Typing > Pen~ Typing, when created, quickly took over as the next big thing. The pen, for writers, became dinosaur like. Ancient. Therefore, typing is certainly better then writing stuff out.

So how do I beat a dragon? Having a massive pair of balls would be the first step. The next would be to type things, and therefore I kill a dragon. You see? My logic is perfectly clear.

DemonCarterLogic • Opuss № I